GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 9070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 220W)
Radeon RX 9070 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2520MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2984
Radeon RX 9070
+1110%
36130
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3566
Radeon RX 9070
+653%
26876
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
1606
Radeon RX 9070
+713%
13072
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2025
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1330 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
56
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
112
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
564.5 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
72.25 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
36.13 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1129 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 48
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
(215-176600331)
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8