GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Arc A380M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2000MHz vs 1335MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
Arc A380M
4096
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
