GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1335MHz vs 1300MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
Arc Pro A60M
+29%
5325
Blender
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
870
Arc Pro A60M
+31%
1144
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
