GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs FirePro M8900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+214%
4101
FirePro M8900
1306
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
960
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0