GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs FirePro W4170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1335MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+493%
4101
FirePro W4170M
691
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Opal
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)