GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1442MHz vs 1335MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+85%
4101
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
2215
Blender
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+300%
870
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
217
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+192%
111
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
38
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Feb 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1366 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
84.10GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
6
1536
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.61 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.22 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.61 GFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.215 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.22 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
N17P-G0-A1
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
