GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Mobility FireGL V5700
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+2747%
4101
Mobility FireGL V5700
144
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
120
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
M86
-
GPU Variant
M86-M GL
(216-0683008)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
