GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVS 2100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+10415%
4101
NVS 2100M
39
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
2
1536
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
11W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT218
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
