GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro 575
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 217.0GB/s)
Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
Radeon Pro 575
+9%
4489
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+46%
4973
Radeon Pro 575
3393
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+70%
2304
Radeon Pro 575
1351
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1695 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
217.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
35.07 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.3 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.489 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.489 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
280.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XL
(215-0910052)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4