GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1335MHz vs 1053MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+117%
4101
Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
1887
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+227%
4973
Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
1518
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+428%
2304
Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
436
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Mar 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1002 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1053 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.85 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.97 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.887 TFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.887 TFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
117.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4