GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R5 M330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1335MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+522%
4101
Radeon R5 M330
659
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
955 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
41.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
18W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Exo
-
GPU Variant
Exo PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0