GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R7 M380
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 M380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1335MHz vs 915MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+250%
4101
Radeon R7 M380
1171
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
915 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.64 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.60 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1171 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)