GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+2731%
5437
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
192
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
120
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
RV630
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
