GeForce GTX 260M vs FirePro M4000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (33W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
FirePro M4000
+124%
691
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
33W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Chelsea
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1