Home Comparison GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1755MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile +2817%
8986

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1455 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
20
112
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.24 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.986 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.986 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
140.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
AD107
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net