GeForce GTX 260M vs RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 115W)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
4496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+4971%
15620
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
36
112
Shading Units
4608
56
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
144
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.62 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.62 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
244.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
115W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
AD106
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
22.9 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
188 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
