GeForce GTX 260M vs RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 110W)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
7312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+7925%
24720
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 200M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
58
112
Shading Units
7424
56
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
110W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
AD104
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
