GeForce GTX 260M vs RTX A2000 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
RTX A2000 Max Q
+1906%
6180
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
682 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
20
112
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
95W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA107
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
