GeForce GTX 295 vs A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
A2
+660%
4531
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
10
240
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA107
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
