GeForce GTX 295 vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
Arc A350
+415%
3072
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
