GeForce GTX 295 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
+1762%
596
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
32
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
289W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
RV620
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1