GeForce GTX 295 vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (289W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
H3C XG310
+299%
2381
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
24
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG1
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
