GeForce GTX 295 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
7440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (210W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+6549%
39630
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
60
240
Shading Units
7680
80
TMUs
240
28
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
210W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD103
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
