GeForce GTX 460 vs Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 200W)
Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
3760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
907
Arc A780
+1886%
18020
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
DG2-512
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
