GeForce GTX 460 vs Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
907
Arc Pro A40
+283%
3482
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
