GeForce GTX 460 vs Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
907
Arc Pro A60
+825%
8397
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 400
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
2048
56
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
DG2-256
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
