GeForce GTX 460 vs FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
16 additional rendering cores
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
+106%
907
FireGL V8650
440
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 400
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
160W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
R600
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
