GeForce GTX 460 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
907
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+214%
2849
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
7
SM Count
14
336
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
TU116
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
