GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 260W)
Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
3760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
907
Radeon Pro SSG
+1255%
12290
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
Vega 10
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4