GeForce GTX 465 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 465
855
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+233%
2849
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.7GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
11
SM Count
14
352
Shading Units
896
44
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
13.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
26.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
855.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
106.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU106
GF100-030-A3
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
