GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 300W)
A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1740MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
A40 PCIe
+2260%
37420
Blender
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
103
A40 PCIe
+3773%
3990
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 600
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
84
768
Shading Units
10752
64
TMUs
336
24
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GA102
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
