GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+4853%
1585
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
32
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
RV620
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1