GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+3964%
1585
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
39
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GT218
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
