GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+489%
1585
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
269
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
28
24
ROPs
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
G80
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
