GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1590MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+79%
2849
Blender
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
103
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+411%
527
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
23
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+217%
73
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
TU117
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
