GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1190MHz vs 1032MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+15%
1828
Blender
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
103
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+73%
179
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
23
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+91%
44
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
768
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GM206
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
