GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 111% (2175MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+1586%
26730
Blender
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
103
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+4499%
4737
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
23
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2039%
492
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 600
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
768
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
AD104
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
