GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+746%
3250
FireGL V7600
384
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
1536
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
195W
TDP
127W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
R600
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
