GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 106% (2175MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
3250
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+722%
26730
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 600
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
195W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
AD104
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
