GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs FirePro S9010
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro S9010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
FirePro S9010 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2108
FirePro S9010
+36%
2867
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
960
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO
(215-0821056)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1