Home Comparison GeForce GTX 950M vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

GeForce GTX 950M vs RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 950M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1680MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
9088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950M
1439
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +2171%
32690

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

993 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
76
640
Shading Units
9728
40
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD103
N16P-GT
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net