GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs FirePro S9010
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro S9010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 960 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
FirePro S9010 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2460
FirePro S9010
+16%
2867
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1176 MHz
Base Clock
-
1201 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
76.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
2.460 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
76.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Tahiti
GTX 960 OEM
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO
(215-0821056)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
