GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Arc Pro A50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 116% (2350MHz vs 1089MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+39%
6691
Arc Pro A50
4813
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+62%
5418
Arc Pro A50
3328
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
3072
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
