GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1089MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2856 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+1148%
6691
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
536
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
3072
Shading Units
216
192
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GT200
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
