GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1190MHz vs 1089MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+266%
6691
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1828
Blender
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+203%
543
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+100%
88
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
44
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1026 MHz
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
3072
Shading Units
768
192
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GM206
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
