GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 168% (2920MHz vs 1089MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
6691
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+614%
47840
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2025
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
3072
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
Navi 48
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
8 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
