Home Comparison GeForce MX150 vs FirePro M8900

GeForce MX150 vs FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1177
FirePro M8900 +10%
1306

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
960
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Blackcomb
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net