GeForce MX250 vs Arc A370M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Arc A370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Arc A370M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1550MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
Arc A370M
+298%
3174
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
Arc A370M
+218%
3440
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
Arc A370M
+620%
1599
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Arc A370M
+248%
251
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.60 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.20 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.349 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.174 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
793.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
