GeForce MX250 vs FirePro M3100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1038MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+48%
797
FirePro M3100
537
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
700 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.80 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
537.6 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)