Home Comparison GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (10W vs 45W)
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.26GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +15%
797
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
691
Blender
GeForce MX250 +105%
72
GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
35

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1254 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
80.26GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
45W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N13P-GT-W-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net